File #: RES 16-010    Version: 1 Name: Resolution to Set Hearing for Tidland Parkway Vacation
Type: Resolution Status: Passed
File created: 5/10/2016 In control: CITY COUNCIL REGULAR
On agenda: 5/16/2016 Final action: 5/16/2016
Title: Resolution No. 16-010 Setting a Public Hearing Concerning the Proposed Vacation of Tidland Parkway, also known as NW Rolling Hills Drive Details: Resolution No. 16-010 sets the public hearing date of June 6, 2016, for the vacation of Tidland Parkway located in and adjacent to the Belz Place Subdivision. This vacation request coincides with Section 3 of the development agreement between the City and Pahlisch Homes at Belz Place LLC that was approved by Council by way of adoption of Resolution 16-007 on May 2, 2016. The applicant desires to have the City vacate the existing right-of-way. The applicant would then simultaneously dedicate back to the City a realigned right-of-way that would contain approximately 0.69 acre less than the proposed vacation area. Development Agreement Section 3.1, Section 3.2 and Section 4, in part, could be considered as compensation for the net loss in right-of-way area. Attached is a depiction of the existing right-of-way, which is shown as shaded, and the ...
Attachments: 1. Resolution No. 16-010, 2. Recorded Development Agreement, 3. Belz Place Proposed Before and After Right-of-Way
Related files: REP 16-138, AI 16-114, RES 16-007, AI 16-198, AI 16-168, ORD 16-009, AI 16-266

Title

Resolution No. 16-010 Setting a Public Hearing Concerning the Proposed Vacation of Tidland Parkway, also known as NW Rolling Hills Drive

Details:  Resolution No. 16-010 sets the public hearing date of June 6, 2016, for the vacation of Tidland Parkway located in and adjacent to the Belz Place Subdivision. This vacation request coincides with Section 3 of the development agreement between the City and Pahlisch Homes at Belz Place LLC that was approved by Council by way of adoption of Resolution 16-007 on May 2, 2016. The applicant desires to have the City vacate the existing right-of-way. The applicant would then simultaneously dedicate back to the City a realigned right-of-way that would contain approximately 0.69 acre less than the proposed vacation area. Development Agreement Section 3.1, Section 3.2 and Section 4, in part, could be considered as compensation for the net loss in right-of-way area. Attached is a depiction of the existing right-of-way, which is shown as shaded, and the Belz Place Subdivision right-of-way proposed to be dedicated. 

Presenter:  James Carothers, Engineering Manager

Recommended Action

Recommended Action:  Staff recommends Council move to adopt Resolution No. 16-010.